Name:     

E-Mail:   

Subject:  

Comments: : : I think before this kind of issue can be decided people need to decide what
: : being a member really means.  Do members pay dues?  Do members have to
: : contribute certain things?  Do we want a lot of members or only a select few
: : and what criteria should be used to determine whether someone's "in" or not?

: These are important questions.  Ones I'm hoping the current group
: will help resolve.  I will write up a new thread, and ask all to
: help hash this out.

: : Until people address some of these questions, the idea of restricting things
: : to "just members" is rather silly.  Currently all one has to do to become a
: : member is fill out a web form (and we don't even verify that any of the
: : supplied info is correct).  Restricting things to just members is basically
: : meaningless.

: I would be surprised if the current group decides to keep the membership
: so easy to join.  I would expect qualifications, code of ethics, and
: such to be set.  Also some way for members to "retire" any other members
: which could (or cause) harm to the professional reputation of TeamJava.

: Also, I would expect that members would only share their valuable contributions
: with others that also share...



Optional Link URL:  

Link Title:         

Optional Image URL: